pro & con
 

DOES THE CUSTOMER GAIN FROM CONSOLIDATION


 

Pro

  Con

College and industry leaders should collaborate increasingly in developing curriculum that bridges the gaps between the academic and business worlds. Contemporary education, beyond fundamental course work, demands continuous revision to keep pace with changes in technology and to remain relevant to the challenges of the marketplace.

Butler Manufacturing was encouraged by recent opportunities to provide input on technician and engineering programs at several regional colleges. Our recommendations focused on new construction technology and relevant computer-system applications. In addition to donating building components for use in “hands-on” instruction, the company also provided some students with intern and direct-employment experience at company facilities.

I’ve concluded from exchanges with audiences after my lecture appearances that more academic emphasis is needed on developing interpersonal skills, such as team-building, communications, and change management. Whereas students become accustomed to the academic grading system that rewards individual efforts, few successful business outcomes can be credited solely to individual effort. Every organizational achievement that I am familiar with resulted from team interaction.

Students would therefore benefit from participating in more “team assignments.” At the individual level, progress toward personal or business objectives also demands
effective written and oral communications. Presentation-based assignments would provide a foundation in these vital business skills.

Finally, today’s rapidly evolving global markets require a more dynamic leadership approach to respond effectively to the rate of change on the multinational business scene. This demands more academic preparation in initiating, implementing and accommodating change.

Many educators have embraced some or all of these concepts. Mounting competitive factors that suggest “quicker is better” should apply equally to college curriculum planning. Much could be gained from increased cooperation between industry and academic leadership.

Don Pratt is chairman of the board of Butler Manufacturing Company. He can be reached by phone at 816-968-3400 or by email at dhpratt@butlermfg.org.

 

The simple answer to the above question is “Yes, and industry currently does shape college curriculum.” And, furthermore, industry should shape college curricula. However, the real question is whether or not that influence should extend to entry-level skills or to the long-term value of the employee to the company. I would argue that shaping the curriculum toward entry-level skills is shortsighted and, in the long-term, more expensive.

I believe this question is best addressed in the context of the principles underlying a true liberal-arts education. Such an education combines rigorous academics with the development of a personal sense of responsibility and ethics to prepare leaders who are able to face and manage the changes of an emerging global community. The best education for today’s world is one that allows for the acquisition of knowledge along with the critical-thinking, problem-solving and communications skills necessary to operate effectively in an increasingly diverse and complex community. The best curriculum nurtures the skills needed for lifelong learning.

Our conversations with area business leaders affirm that a liberal-arts education is still the preferred form of preparation for the best-equipped and most sought-after employees. Professional or technical competency is only a part of the equation. We must look to the development of true leaders who embrace not only technical preparedness but also a strong sense of personal direction, ethics and values.

The challenge met by the best liberal-arts education is to instill these qualities in leaders equipped to adapt to changes in the environment, rather than simply developing technically proficient specialists. Industry must play a role in helping to meet this challenge. But the systemic solution lies in the continued support and development of institutions of higher education equipped to take a broad view of human development—a process that produces not only productive employees, but also effective leaders.

Dr. David L. Sallee was inaugurated as William Jewell’s 14th president in April 2000. He holds a Ph.D. in adult and higher education from the University of Oklahoma. He may be reached at 816.781.7700.

   
Return to Table of Contents